So a random thought while watching the black line up and down the pool. Something has been bugging me about the AI feedback, as in I just wasn’t finding it useful, and I now realize why.
At the moment, all the AI feedback is doing is converting your data from the workout into sentence form, and repeating what numbers you hit from the data shown in the workout summary.
I can see some limited usefulness there, but I think what would be more useful for the AI feedback is to interpret the numbers from that session, along with the recent training data from relevant sessions from the day(s) before, and give feedback on where you are going wrong, can improve, might be missing the mark, or might be overdoing things.
An example, my most recent session feedback:
You completed the planned 40 minutes of running while slightly exceeding the planned load (59 vs. 53), which is a positive sign of your improving strength. Covering 6.5 km at an average pace of 06:10/km with an average heart rate of 135 shows you maintained the intended L2 HR intensity. Your efficiency factor of 1.31 indicates a good balance between pace and heart rate. With an RPE of 2/10, it seems the session felt easy, and your 4/5 feeling score reflects your positive experience. Keep up the great work!
You can see, that is really just telling me the numbers I can already see on the workout summary in sentence form, some like RPE etc I entered myself anyway.
Instead, it would be way more useful if it noticed things from within this and recent workouts and gave suggestions. For example, this one asked me to do that workout over undulating terrain, and to take it super easy (L2), slower than normal L2.
In reality, it was on a flat course (just the nature of my surroundings), and while I did take it easy, my pacing was faster than it should have been.
More interesting feedback would have been pointing out (based on Garmin data), that I might want to use a treadmill, or find better terrain to run on next time as I wasn’t getting the intended benefits of the session, that my pacing seems high, but as the HR data was good, maybe it is time for a new FTP test to ensure we are setting the right zones.
Perhaps not the best example, but you get the gist.
I guess, in a nutshell, if it was a human coach, and I did a workout, and they said “great job mate, give me your Garmin so I can read all your data back to you then go on your way”, I doubt they’d be my coach much longer
Keep up the great work!